data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05b5c/05b5ccf8db47c359ffa05a73971fe6cc4653e341" alt=""
Afghanistan's leading human rights organization said today it is investigating the possibility that white phosphorus was used in a U.S.-Taliban battle that killed 130+ Afghan civilians. The U.S. military rejected speculation it had used the weapon, insisting it was Taliban militants who did the deed, despite ABC News photos to the contrary.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/085da/085da02dd291b7d66bd1d0e550e20d79540bf0a4" alt=""
White phosphorus can be employed legitimately in battle, but rights groups say its use over populated areas can indiscriminately burn civilians and constitutes a war crime. Launching it at a town occupied by both Taliban fighters and civilians would therefore constitute a war crime. Human rights groups denounce the use of white phosphorus for the severe burns it causes, though it is not banned by any treaty to which the United States is a signatory. It is however banned by numerous other countries.
Afghan doctors are concerned over what they are calling "unusual" burns on hundreds of Afghans wounded in last Monday's battle in Farah province, which President Hamid Karzai has said killed approx. 130 Afghan civilians. The incident in Farah drew the condemnation of President Karzai who called for an end to American airstrikes on civilian populations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e733/1e7339913e9e29687a33a08a210425e0ea6dd126" alt=""
Colonel Greg Julian, the top U.S. military spokesman in Afghanistan, said the U.S. did not use white phosphorus as a weapon during last week's battle. The U.S. does use white phosphorous to illuminate the night sky, he said. (He apparently has not seen the ABC photos yet of American troops launching it during day hours.) Instead he suggested the chemical burns might be from exploding propane tanks, but didn't explain how exploding propane tanks could kill 130 civilians and burn hundreds of others.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad9f9/ad9f9649061692632e7adbec73b9b5c317e968fc" alt=""
Dr. Mohammad Aref Jalali, the head of the burn unit at the Herat Regional Hospital disagrees. "I think it's the result of a chemical used in a bomb, but I'm not sure what kind of chemical. But if it was a result of a burning house – from petrol or gas cylinders – that kind of burn would look different," he said.
"There has been other airstrikes in Farah in the past. We had injuries from those battles, but this is the first time we have seen such burns on the bodies. I'm not sure what kind of bomb it was," says Gul Ahmad Ayubi, the deputy head of Farah's health department.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68a40/68a40cfe4f9f56e3b38190efd1d1540c96b6494c" alt=""
An estimated 17 members of the Taliban were killed in last Monday's chemical attack, although this has not been confirmed.
Today Afghanistan called for the United States to come clean on the incidents.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments containing links will be marked as spam and not approved. We moderate every comment. If you want to advertise on this blog it is $30 per link.